Published in the original heartland website on 12 April 2004
Excerpts from a Dharma talk by Ajahn Brahmavamso
The following excerpt (or transcript) was taken from a Dharma talk present by Venerable Ajahn Brahmavamso during the Global Buddhist Conference 2000 in Singapore, which was held on the 3rd and 4th June 2000. The excerpts are taken from a cassette recordings taped during the conference and I would like to apologize, firstly, for any mistake in transcribing it. Also I would like to confess that I did not transcribe his entire talk.
Ajahn Brahmavamso was born Peter Betts in London. He trained under Ajahn Chah in Thailand and was ordained in 1975. He now resides in Perth, Australia and is the Abbot of the Bodhinayana Monastry.
Excepts of his Dharma talk
Firstly, I am not gay, but wearing this robe in Western Australia, I can known as queer! [laughter from audience]
First of all, on the topic of homosexuality and queerness, I would like to raise a point that people should never address these questions from a position of fear and many times that we are afraid to confront this issue deeply, is simply because of fear.
The first thing I would like to say from the Buddhist perspective is that, whenever we have a hard decision to make or hard choice to make, we must look at our minds to see if we have, what the Buddha calls, “perversions of thought”; that we should not make our decisions or actions out of fear, out of desire, out of ill-will and stupidity. And particularly attitudes to homosexuals, whether its your friends or children or other people in society, should not be thought of from the position of fear.
Having confronted homosexuality just by being in a Western country, this subject has to come up, which monks and nuns and everyone has to confront. Because there are some people who will become your disciples and even want to become monks or nuns and join the Sangha, some of them are homosexuals, or some of your disciples’ children are homosexuals.
Very often, they ask the question, “Is homosexuality breaking the 5 precepts?” Particularly, this concerns the 3rd precept, which concerns sexual misconduct. However, the studies of Buddhist meaning of the term sexual misconduct certainly does not include homosexual activities. And its fascinating that the Buddha was certainly aware about homosexuality in his time. There were many cases mentioned in old scriptures, especially the Vinaya (the code of ethics for monks and nuns) of homosexual acts and those who were that way inclined and he certainly never included it under the 5 precepts.
When we talk about the 3rd precept, of sexual misconduct, it literally concerns adultery or illicit sex, especially between a man or a woman who were not married and that concern sexual relations that were considered inappropriate at that time, but it certainly does not include homosexual and lesbian activities.
So when we look at the ethical issues of homosexuality, we cannot use the 5 precepts as they don’t apply. The fact that it was not mentioned was an indication that the Buddha did not think that it was that bad after all an activity to be included in the 5 precepts. And so we have to logically treat homosexual and lesbian relationships to the same category as heterosexual relationship. In other words, the law of karma, the understanding of goodness and that which brings forth happiness in future lives and happiness in this life… which mean we have to look at homosexuality in the same light as heterosexuality, in other words if its a loving, caring, non-exploitative relationship, with consenting adults at appropriate age, there seems to be nothing morally wrong with it.
And indeed there are nothing in the sutras, or the Vinaya of the Buddhist Theravada tradition that there is anything wrong with it, nor in the commentaries.
In fact, there are many disciples in Perth who have homosexual relationships and they are very happy to know that they are accepted into the Buddhist order, and that they can come and practice Dharma, and indeed they are jolly good Buddhist who serves the Buddhist community in Western Australia and other places with the diligence and care which is very commendable. And they do learn from the talks and guidance of Buddhism very wonderful ways to live with their partners in a wholesome environment, in a caring relation, which have benefited themselves and others…
And indeed that because such people do feel attracted to Buddhism and that they can find a way of practicing their lives within the Buddhist order, it is a service we can give, not just to some people, but to all people. And many of you notice how inclusive and embracing the Buddha was. He would embrace into the followers of the Sangha, prostitutes and criminals simply because he has a very non-judgmental and encouraging teaching to give to everybody…
And if anyone has a son or daughter or friend who is a homosexual, and as far as the precepts are concern, there is nothing wrong. As far as karma is concern, it depends on how you are homosexual, not that they are homosexuals and please do not be afraid of them. Please look at them with Buddhist compassion and understanding, and please know how hard it is to be a homosexual in today’s world, in some places, where they are not understood, where they are looked upon with fear. And Buddhist compassion must be able to accept them for who they are and encourage them, if they are going to be a homosexual, be a compassionate, be a kind and be a moral homosexual.
Some questions for the Ajahn Brahmavamso
How do we help those people with homophobia to overcome their fears, especially parents of gay sons or daughters?
From my own experience, I learned to overcome those fears by meeting with gay people and to get to know them and be friends with them. And please, you don’t have to be gay to be friend to a gay person! And as such you can learn from their experiences.
And as to how we can help parents to understand gays, I remember some time ago, one parent was very upset that their son was gay and came to me for advice. And I told them: “When you chant loving kindness (in the Theravada tradition), you would say, “May all beings be happy and well. May all beings be free from suffering.” Isn’t your son one of those beings? Why do you distinguish people who are gay, and you hate your son, but would give love to animals and cows and be a vegetarian? Surely, you can extend your loving kindness to all beings, including your son?
Is it bad karma to born homosexual?
In Buddhism, it is said that its bad karma to have to be born again [laughter and loud applause].
Its not what we are born as, Singaporeans or Englishmen, or where, it is what we do with that birth that is important. So if you are born with those tendencies, accept those tendencies and learn from them and certainly make sure that your homosexual activities are kind, warm and loving, and that you don’t abuse those sexual urges. I think that the greatest danger of homosexuality is the abuse of their sexuality, just as sometimes men’s sexuality is abused with prostitutes.
So you cannot say what the karmic cause is for homosexuals, it is just such a complex cause and effect system. So don’t go looking at the past and at what has happened to me. That is why when someone comes to a Buddhist monk with a problem, they don’t usually get too much sympathy, “Oh, you poor thing!”. I would say “What are you doing about it?”. See what you can do to make it a worthwhile lifestyle.
WHOEVER MAY SAY ANY THING . LET ANY MONK IN THE WORLD SAY ANYTHING , BUT BUDDHISM ALWAYS SAYS THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS A TYPE OF ADULTERY AND SHOULD BE CONDEMNED IN ALLL ALLLLLLLLLLLL AND ALLLLLLLLLLLLLL ITS FORMS . PLEASE LISTEN TO ME IF ANY BODY HAS QUERY PLEASE EMAIL ME AT suryadear@yahoo.com ,i am a buddhist and fond of answering to any body regarding homosexuality and buddhism, buddha was himself a great physician how can he aagree to some thing which is an unnatural offense?????????????????????????????????????? just thiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnkkkkkkkkkkkk……………………
Well Surya, you should a bit agitated. I am curious to understand which Buddhist references you have linking homosexuality to adultery?
so wat is the diffrent between man and women ?
the diffrent between man and women just cock and pussy
so if u love somebody just because of his cock or her pussy … that’s very interesting …
and where is loving, caring, non-exploitative relationship within a relationship?
think about it…
haha …
Beautiful talk – thanks for taking the time to transcribe it.
well said! SADHU SADHU SADHU! thanks for the transcribe.
Dear surya, who r u? Are u so enlightened that u have transcended us all and now in your divinity have the right to judge others? I think u should study Buddhism more deeply to gain an understanding of what it is to accept others.
Dear Surya,
i bet you have not even touch the teachings, suttas, precepts (and many more) of buddhism…please back up your statements with quotes from the buddhist teachings…perhaps you will learn…to be humble and modest, or else, bad karma will bite you in the ass real hard
I would like to address Sury.Why should it be important a person”s sexual orientation.Isnt the main thing to be kind,compassionate,and caring?Does being homosexual mean that you cannot be kind?compassionate?caring?why should anyone else care where someone finds love and exceptance in their life?
My dear Surya,
As a Buddhist you must be chanting ‘May all beings be happy’ everyday, but yours may have a little modification: ‘May all beings, except for homosexuals, be happy’
Sachitra
Very good answer.. thank you Sachitra. Metta…
what ajahn brahm says is absolutely right. Shah Navas S Kerala India
Quote: “When we talk about the 3rd precept, of sexual misconduct, it literally concerns adultery or illicit sex, especially between a man or a woman who were not married and that concern sexual relations that were considered inappropriate at that time, but it certainly does not include homosexual and lesbian activities.”
Please do pardon me, as I am still in seek of Buddha’s teachings. However, in Buddha’s scriptures, the above statement might be incorrect.
For those who can read Chinese characters:
婆塞戒经 - 业品第二十四
佛经原文:
若于非时非处非女处女他妇。若属自身是名邪淫。唯三天下有邪淫罪。郁单曰无。若畜生若破坏。若属僧若系狱。若亡逃若师妇。若出家人近如是人。名为邪淫。出家之人无所系属。从谁得罪。从其亲属王所得罪。恶时乱时虐王出时。怖畏之时。若令妇妾出家剃发。还近之者是得淫罪。若到三道是得淫罪。若自若他。在于道边塔边祠边大会之处。作非梵行得邪淫罪。若为父母兄弟国王之所守护。或先与他期。或先许他。或先受财。或先受请。木泥画像及以死尸。如是人边作非梵行。得邪淫罪。若属自身而作他想。属他之人而作自想。亦名邪淫。如是邪淫亦有轻重。从重烦恼则得重罪。从轻烦恼则得轻罪
非时——制戒律所规定的不应行淫的日期及时间;
非处——指戒律所规定的不应行淫的处所及「三道」;
*非女——指同性恋、人畜之间行淫;
处女——未婚女;
他妇——有夫之妇;
自身——自身行淫,如手淫;
这些情况下行淫的,均为邪淫。
The above segment elaborates on sexual moral conduct and it states that sexual activities between men infringes on the 5 Abstention.
As a beginner in the path to seek Buddha’s teachings, I am in no position to make statements of absolution. However, I believe that Buddha does not condemn nor judge anyone, as Buddha is compassionate.
There is nothing wrong about being gay. One can still find a boyfriend and settle down, just that the relationship between 2 men is purely based on love and no sexual activities. I hope that I have not misunderstood Buddha’s true meaning and pray that I am able to obtain greater wisdom in seek of understanding the true meaning of Buddhism.
Could you please tell me the name of this talk or give me a link to this audio talk. I would appreciate it very much..